Young earth creationists and carbon 14 dating of diamonds

If any of the above assumptions are wrong, projected timelines based on them are almost certainly wrong, and we have no way of determining rock ages.Whenever we see rocks form today, we always see daughter atoms in the beginning, so evolutionary ideas about rock formation contradict observational science.

The rotational speed of the Earth is gradually slowing down because of gravitational drag forces of the sun and moon as well as other factors.Helium should have diffused out of the zircon samples very rapidly and be completely gone if the Earth were more than several thousands of years old, and it certainly could not be billions of years old.Accelerated decay in zircon samples shows the Earth and its zircon cannot be more then 6,000 years old (give or take 2,000 years), not billions of years old as conventionally assumed.Dates yielded from the above models and many others are more scientific than those typically promoted by long age evolutionists, but this clear evidence for a young Earth is unscientifically ignored simply because it doesn’t fit with a long-age evolutionary worldview.All fossils reveal distinct, fully functioning creatures that show purpose and design, but never transitional forms with partially developed features.

Leave a Reply